In disputes in which the damages, accounting, valuation or electronic discovery are at issue, Fulcrum’s skills contribute additional value to what legal-based judges, arbitrators and mediators typically address.
- Special Master to review electronic discovery in camera, and provided the receiving party with only those materials relevant to the discovery order.
- Court or party appointed appraiser to establish the purchase price of a company due to a statutory liquidation such as California Corporations Code Sections 2000 or 16701, or a shareholder/partner buyout agreement.
- Court appointed appraiser or accountant to determine the amounts to be distributed to shareholders/partners in a liquidation – Such matters often involve analysis and potential restatement of existing accounting records.
- Arbitrator involving the amount of a contractual purchase price adjustment relating to the sale of a company – Such adjustments are often based on (i) changes in working capital, (ii) earnings during a stub period, or (iii) the amount of tangible net worth.
- Court or appointed analyst – In each of these cases, the Court determined that complex financial liability or damages issues could be better analyzed by having an independent party address issues in which the parties faced severe disagreement.
- Court or party appointed referee to break deadlocks involving (i) management disagreements and (ii) valuation and sale of business assets, or (iii) use and distribution of funds in a business – These assignments involved appointment as a receiver, or appointment as a third – tie-breaking – member of the board of directors.
- Court appointed bankruptcy examiner – Each of these engagements investigated allegations of fraud, assessed the opportunities for the debtor to reorganize, and addressed other financial matters specified by the court.
- Court or party appointed discovery master – These engagements typically involve allegations of thefts of trade secrets. The parties are interested in comparing the plaintiff’s and defendant’s information (e.g. a customer list), but neither party is tolerant of producing significant proprietary data to its competitor. In such cases, we compare the two parties’ information using electronic means and report overlaps in the data.
- Court or party appointed computer forensic analyst – These engagements often involve privacy or relevancy objections of a party producing an entire disk of forensically-captured electronic information. To avoid issues of disclosure to an adverse party, we acquire and review the information, and determine what should be produced to the requesting party per joint or court instructions.